Why are you saying this guy? Watch the documentary above, and many of these arguments were rejected under. For disputes between you probably have a forum or somewhere that concerns echo chamber. I saw the documentary is well done.
Nonsense. These “sins” are just sins, because God has decided they are. Why give people, even the only option to a point metaphorical gun to his head and demand obedience under threat of torture. Some est.Je mercy simply do not understand why a blood sacrifice is considered the ultimate sacrifice, or why it should matter to nous.D other hand, do not need God. If your our own decisions to do things when its decisions are taken too. There is no obligation to pay you ****.
If I had $ 100.00 on my credit card company and came to me and said, you know what, my son here, pay their debt. Personally, I’m not going to answer “do not give a flying f ***. Why do you keep track of what I owe you?” But it’s just me. . .
I stand corrected, “chopped” his intérêt.Anywho, what difference does it make if God forgives us say, of Christ or shipment to cover our sins, the point is our sin against him is forgiven because this He has done for us , nothing that we ourselves once mêmes.Encore is a merciful God, God is not a barbarian. We * must * deserves eternal damnation, we have sinned against him, however, we are forgiven.
So what? Sacrifice his “only son” (ignoring that he could easily do more) it is assumed that we care. . . Why? I could not give a damn personnellement.D Moreover, why send your child to pay for the sins that you yourself are keeping consistency. God might say, “You know, I forgive all.”. A living sacrifice, primitive and barbaric – is that the God of the Old Testament.
Point of Law (also known as the Torah) is to define who is God (Saint-Just, right) and what God requires of man, and show how we, the descendants of Adam can not maintain law. Then in his mercy and grace sent his Son in human form (hence the virgin birth through Mary), taking the penalty he (Christ) of God’s inability to maintain their rights law, but the Son of the performance of its legislation. Boom, Christianity. For me it is quite surprising that it did for us.
I use the distinction of religion, because it’s interesting to me, at least clear that the Christian God is not Christian, or born dead or resurrected and edited as such. I’ve never understood this point, other than what gives legitimacy to take the Torah as part of it is the doctrine that. . . I guess that gives legitimacy. The Christian church built houses and holidays in the bones of other major religions and the vanquished. Not that there’s a problem with this is the way of the world and humanity.
I’m not sure if it is agreeable or not, if so bravo. It’s pretty ridiculous. Imagine a God who can do anything to create miracles beyond comprehension, but that must permeate a virgin giving birth to a Jew who will die horribly as a scapegoat for the sins of semi-Jews without ever consulting practice to those who have sinned against you! I’m with the idea that religion is useless, that I think cable is to seek a firm explanation of the things we see, but be rational.
You’re right Bob Smith. Do not care if there altogether, and we want to kill for fun – oh wait. True, he sent his only Son to die for us to pay for our sins, because we can, and to reconcile us back to Him!
morality has little to do with religion. I say turn on the Old Testament, if you want a clear idea of what the Judeo-Christian God is. not a good person who does not care if it exists, can kill for fun or for spite, and certainly does not offer concrete rewards for other services not kill you for fun. This is an old, old god everyone after the Jews have tried to remake his image of hope. This is incorrect, at best, assuming that the first book is true. Take it from a Jew.
Geeks @ “without Christianity, all morality is subjective, there is no clear vision of good and evil.” In the first book of the Bible, God kills the world! Drowning, even babies! This sends a terrible scourge of torture innocent Egyptians, who had no role in decision making Pharaoh. He told Moses to kill all the “promised land”. And this is considered moral by any Christian simply because God made / ordered! You call that moral clarity?
This is called the axiomatic construction. Each line of thought must begin with an axiom. Something that simply assume it’s true. You’re only making Jesus to be true and to infer some kind of slap what is wrong (as if Christianity is characterized by moral clarity throughout history). I guess slapping bad. For Christianity, of course, you have my other cheek. In real life, would end with a first-hand experience * * What is the evil of their hands.
I do not understand. Wilson has not been the punching bag. You atheists like screaming at the top of their lungs, the same theory over and over, there is no God. However, without Christianity, all morals are subjective, there is no clear vision of good and evil. If it occurs to me slap you now, you can not call that evil, or if you start now, it looks as bad, or worse, can not even call the Holocaust bad at all. So practically, Wilson got into this argument,
Eikinkloster Congratulations, you’ve done in a single sentence, a word on a tree, what happened to Christopher Hitchens avoided saying in this film as a whole (apparently). Humans have an innate desire to be reunited. As our “group” develops, most slowly merges with a vision of social morality to another. These views social, moral is determined by our innate predisposition to be socially neurological permanent primates. Our empathy for our brothers and sisters our guides décisions.Wilson refuted.
Very good movie. Hitchens is earned, but a fact.
My favorite parts were when he took the meeting out of the discussion, dinner conversations were great
@ MclaumarVous would agree with a credit card company eliminate debt free with the human sacrifice?
Why are you saying this guy? Watch the documentary above, and many of these arguments were rejected under. For disputes between you probably have a forum or somewhere that concerns echo chamber. I saw the documentary is well done.
Yall Jesus saves, but again most Jews do.
Nonsense. These “sins” are just sins, because God has decided they are. Why give people, even the only option to a point metaphorical gun to his head and demand obedience under threat of torture. Some est.Je mercy simply do not understand why a blood sacrifice is considered the ultimate sacrifice, or why it should matter to nous.D other hand, do not need God. If your our own decisions to do things when its decisions are taken too. There is no obligation to pay you ****.
If I had $ 100.00 on my credit card company and came to me and said, you know what, my son here, pay their debt. Personally, I’m not going to answer “do not give a flying f ***. Why do you keep track of what I owe you?” But it’s just me. . .
I stand corrected, “chopped” his intérêt.Anywho, what difference does it make if God forgives us say, of Christ or shipment to cover our sins, the point is our sin against him is forgiven because this He has done for us , nothing that we ourselves once mêmes.Encore is a merciful God, God is not a barbarian. We * must * deserves eternal damnation, we have sinned against him, however, we are forgiven.
the bait of interest.
Both “love of God,” then. . .
So what? Sacrifice his “only son” (ignoring that he could easily do more) it is assumed that we care. . . Why? I could not give a damn personnellement.D Moreover, why send your child to pay for the sins that you yourself are keeping consistency. God might say, “You know, I forgive all.”. A living sacrifice, primitive and barbaric – is that the God of the Old Testament.
Bob, if that sparked her interest to all, I recommend reading Paul’s letter to the Romans. He explains very well.
Point of Law (also known as the Torah) is to define who is God (Saint-Just, right) and what God requires of man, and show how we, the descendants of Adam can not maintain law. Then in his mercy and grace sent his Son in human form (hence the virgin birth through Mary), taking the penalty he (Christ) of God’s inability to maintain their rights law, but the Son of the performance of its legislation. Boom, Christianity. For me it is quite surprising that it did for us.
I use the distinction of religion, because it’s interesting to me, at least clear that the Christian God is not Christian, or born dead or resurrected and edited as such. I’ve never understood this point, other than what gives legitimacy to take the Torah as part of it is the doctrine that. . . I guess that gives legitimacy. The Christian church built houses and holidays in the bones of other major religions and the vanquished. Not that there’s a problem with this is the way of the world and humanity.
I’m not sure if it is agreeable or not, if so bravo. It’s pretty ridiculous. Imagine a God who can do anything to create miracles beyond comprehension, but that must permeate a virgin giving birth to a Jew who will die horribly as a scapegoat for the sins of semi-Jews without ever consulting practice to those who have sinned against you! I’m with the idea that religion is useless, that I think cable is to seek a firm explanation of the things we see, but be rational.
You’re right Bob Smith. Do not care if there altogether, and we want to kill for fun – oh wait. True, he sent his only Son to die for us to pay for our sins, because we can, and to reconcile us back to Him!
morality has little to do with religion. I say turn on the Old Testament, if you want a clear idea of what the Judeo-Christian God is. not a good person who does not care if it exists, can kill for fun or for spite, and certainly does not offer concrete rewards for other services not kill you for fun. This is an old, old god everyone after the Jews have tried to remake his image of hope. This is incorrect, at best, assuming that the first book is true. Take it from a Jew.
Geeks @ “without Christianity, all morality is subjective, there is no clear vision of good and evil.” In the first book of the Bible, God kills the world! Drowning, even babies! This sends a terrible scourge of torture innocent Egyptians, who had no role in decision making Pharaoh. He told Moses to kill all the “promised land”. And this is considered moral by any Christian simply because God made / ordered! You call that moral clarity?
lol loved the piece of metal music: D
This is called the axiomatic construction. Each line of thought must begin with an axiom. Something that simply assume it’s true. You’re only making Jesus to be true and to infer some kind of slap what is wrong (as if Christianity is characterized by moral clarity throughout history). I guess slapping bad. For Christianity, of course, you have my other cheek. In real life, would end with a first-hand experience * * What is the evil of their hands.
I do not understand. Wilson has not been the punching bag. You atheists like screaming at the top of their lungs, the same theory over and over, there is no God. However, without Christianity, all morals are subjective, there is no clear vision of good and evil. If it occurs to me slap you now, you can not call that evil, or if you start now, it looks as bad, or worse, can not even call the Holocaust bad at all. So practically, Wilson got into this argument,
Yes, and it seemed as Hitchens points out guns.
@ Gwisss Wilson is a punching bag.
Come on, it was a pretty good replica. Being an atheist should not make homourless.
Eikinkloster Congratulations, you’ve done in a single sentence, a word on a tree, what happened to Christopher Hitchens avoided saying in this film as a whole (apparently). Humans have an innate desire to be reunited. As our “group” develops, most slowly merges with a vision of social morality to another. These views social, moral is determined by our innate predisposition to be socially neurological permanent primates. Our empathy for our brothers and sisters our guides décisions.Wilson refuted.